Some measures of closeness to unanimity and their implications

Shmuel Nitzan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

This note demonstrates how certain collective decision methods ensure the selection of alternatives which are the closest to win unanimously. By using four different functions for measuring the distance between preference profiles, we obtain the equivalence between the closeness to unanimity procedure (CUP) and the Borda method, the plurality rule, the probabilistic Borda rule and the L-procedure respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-138
Number of pages10
JournalTheory and Decision
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Some measures of closeness to unanimity and their implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this