Social Workers’ Perceptions Regarding Legal Intervention for Older Adults without Significant Cognitive Decline Who Are Abused by Their Adult Child

Sagit Lev, Yael Waksman, Mickey Schindler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Social workers aiding older adults facing abuse from their adult child confront an ethical dilemma: whether to honor autonomy or prevent harm. The study explores how social workers perceive legal intervention against the older adult’s will. Twenty-one aging-specialized social workers took part in semi-structured interviews using a vignette. The analysis was conducted inductively, guided by content analysis principles. Two main themes emerged, focusing on the disadvantages and benefits of legal intervention. The findings underscore that combining teleological and deontological considerations could form a foundation for developing decision-making tools to aid social workers in navigating this dilemma effectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)687-704
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Gerontological Social Work
Volume67
Issue number5
Early online date16 Apr 2024
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

  • Elder abuse
  • ethical dilemmas
  • social workers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social Workers’ Perceptions Regarding Legal Intervention for Older Adults without Significant Cognitive Decline Who Are Abused by Their Adult Child'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this