Abstract
This study examines the theological and liturgical significance of the biblical injunction to “sing a new song,” tracing its deployment across eras of Christian history as both a symbol of renewal and a tool of doctrinal contestation. Focusing on key moments of schism—the early Church’s response to Gnostic and Arian hymnody and Ambrose’s adoption of Eastern antiphonal singing, the article explores how musical form, meter, and performance practice became markers of orthodoxy and heresy long before Reformation-era musical reforms. Drawing on patristic commentary, heresiographical sources, and hymnological analysis, the study highlights how the popular style in various guises was alternately condemned and reclaimed. This suggests that Christian music has consistently evolved through interaction with popular and heterodox forms and that the “new song” in its exegetical form has functioned as a recurring strategy of theological self-definition. Ultimately, the paper argues that disputes over musical style mirror broader tensions between innovation and authority and that the history of hymnody offers a unique lens into the formation of Christian identity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 29 |
| Journal | Religions |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 by the author.
Keywords
- Ambrosian chant
- Arianism
- early Christianity
- hymnody
- iambic dimeter
- liturgical innovation
- musical meter
- schism
- theological authority
- versus populares
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '“Sing Unto the Lord a New Song”: Musical Innovation at the Boundaries of Schism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver