Forgotten but not gone: Context effects on recognition do not require explicit memory for context

Daniel A. Levy, Elinor Rabinyan, Eli Vakil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context effects on recognition memory provide an important indirect assay of associative learning and source memory. Neuropsychological studies have indicated that such context effects may obtain even if the contexts themselves are not remembered - for example, in individuals impaired on direct tests of memory for contextual information. In contrast, a recent study indicated that the effects of temporal context reinstatement on visual recognition obtain only when the contextual information itself was explicitly recollected. Here we report that the effects of reinstatement of spatial-simultaneous context on visual object recognition memory obtain irrespective of whether those context stimuli are explicitly recognized. We suggest that spatial-simultaneous context effects might be based on ensemble unitization of target and context stimuli at encoding, whereas temporal context effects may require recollective processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1620-1628
Number of pages9
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume61
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008

Keywords

  • Association
  • Binding
  • Context
  • Memory
  • Recognition
  • Source memory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forgotten but not gone: Context effects on recognition do not require explicit memory for context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this