Sex and age differences in "theory of mind" across 57 countries using the English version of the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test

David M. Greenberg, Varun Warrier, Ahmad Abu-Akel, Carrie Allison, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Katharina Reinecke, P. Jason Rentfrow, Marcin A. Radecki, Simon Baron-Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes"Test (Eyes Test) is a widely used assessment of "theory of mind."The NIMH Research Domain Criteria recommends it as one of two tests for "understanding mental states."Previous studies have demonstrated an on-average female advantage on the Eyes Test. However, it is unknown whether this female advantage exists across the lifespan and across a large number of countries. Thus, we tested sex and age differences using the English version of the Eyes Test in adolescents and adults across 57 countries. We also tested for associations with sociodemographic and cognitive/personality factors. We leveraged one discovery dataset (N = 305,726) and three validation datasets (Ns = 642; 5,284; and 1,087). The results show that: i) there is a replicable on-average female advantage in performance on the Eyes Test; ii) performance increases through adolescence and shallowly declines across adulthood; iii) the on-average female advantage is evident across the lifespan; iv) there is a significant on-average female advantage in 36 out of 57 countries; v) there is a significant on-average female advantage on translated (non-English) versions of the Eyes Test in 12 out of 16 countries, as confirmed by a systematic review; vi) D-scores, or empathizing-systemizing, predict Eyes Test performance above and beyond sex differences; and vii) the female advantage is negatively linked to "prosperity"and "autonomy,"and positively linked to "collectivism,"as confirmed by exploratory country-level analyses. We conclude that the on-average female advantage on the Eyes Test is observed across ages and most countries.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2022385119
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume120
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 the Author(s).

Funding

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. D.M.G. was funded in part by the Zuckerman STEM Leadership Program. S.B.-C. received funding from the Wellcome Trust 214322\Z\18\Z. The results leading to this publication have received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No. 777394 for the project AIMS-2-TRIALS.This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and EFPIA and AUTISM SPEAKS,Autistica,SFARI.S.B.-C.also received funding from the Autism Centre of Excellence, SFARI, the Templeton World Charitable Fund, the MRC, and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. The research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East of England. All research at the Department of Psychiatry in the University of Cambridge is supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014) and NIHR Applied Research Centre.The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care, or other funders.

FundersFunder number
AUTISM SPEAKS,Autistica,SFARI.S.B.-C
Autism Centre of Excellence
Templeton World Charitable Fund
Wellcome Trust214322
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Innovative Medicines InitiativeAIMS-2-TRIALS, 777394
NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre

    Keywords

    • age differences
    • cognitive empathy
    • cross-cultural
    • reading the mind in the eyes
    • sex differences

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sex and age differences in "theory of mind" across 57 countries using the English version of the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this