Abstract
Background and Aims: ENHANCE was a phase 3 study that evaluated efficacy and safety of seladelpar, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ (PPAR) agonist, versus placebo in patients with primary biliary cholangitis with inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Approach and Results: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to oral seladelpar 5 mg (n=89), 10 mg (n=89), placebo (n=87) daily (with UDCA, as appropriate). Primary end point was a composite biochemical response [alkaline phosphatase (ALP) < 1.67×upper limit of normal (ULN), ≥15% ALP decrease from baseline, and total bilirubin ≤ ULN] at month 12. Key secondary end points were ALP normalization at month 12 and change in pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) at month 6 in patients with baseline score ≥4. Aminotransferases were assessed. ENHANCE was terminated early following an erroneous safety signal in a concurrent, NASH trial. While blinded, primary and secondary efficacy end points were amended to month 3. Significantly more patients receiving seladelpar met the primary end point (seladelpar 5 mg: 57.1%, 10 mg: 78.2%) versus placebo (12.5%) (p < 0.0001). ALP normalization occurred in 5.4% (p=0.08) and 27.3% (p < 0.0001) of patients receiving 5 and 10 mg seladelpar, respectively, versus 0% receiving placebo. Seladelpar 10 mg significantly reduced mean pruritus NRS versus placebo [10 mg: -3.14 (p=0.02); placebo: -1.55]. Alanine aminotransferase decreased significantly with seladelpar versus placebo [5 mg: 23.4% (p=0.0008); 10 mg: 16.7% (p=0.03); placebo: 4%]. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions: Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA who were treated with seladelpar 10 mg had significant improvements in liver biochemistry and pruritus. Seladelpar appeared safe and well tolerated.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 397-415 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Hepatology |
Volume | 78 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 John Wiley and Sons Inc.. All rights reserved.
Funding
This study and preparation of this manuscript were funded by CymaBay Therapeutics, which had a role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. Palak J. Trivedi received institutional salary support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). This paper presents independent research supported by the Birmingham NIHR BRC based at the University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust and the University of Birmingham. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR, or the Department of Health. The authors thank Ke Yang and Kalyan Palla of CymaBay Therapeutics Inc., for assistance with statistical analyses and Holly Capasso-Harris of Certara Synchrogenix for writing assistance that was funded by CymaBay Therapeutics.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust | |
CymaBay Therapeutics | |
National Institute for Health and Care Research | |
University of Birmingham | |
NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre | |
Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre |