TY - JOUR
T1 - Segmentation versus integration
T2 - The case of non-homogeneous groups
AU - Spiegel, U.
AU - Templeman, J.
PY - 2004/1
Y1 - 2004/1
N2 - The paper adds another dimension to the literature on bundling as a profit-maximizing strategy. We compare policies of joint consumption and segmentation of a profit maximizer. In the case of positive social influences between two population groups 'bundling' is preferred to segmentation, while under negative symmetric inter-group effects (based perhaps on race, religion, status etc.) segmentation is preferred. Our contribution lies in the examination of joint consumption versus segmentation under asymmetric inter-group effects, with and without price discrimination. This can occur when non-homogeneous groups share the same residency, school or other local public institutions.
AB - The paper adds another dimension to the literature on bundling as a profit-maximizing strategy. We compare policies of joint consumption and segmentation of a profit maximizer. In the case of positive social influences between two population groups 'bundling' is preferred to segmentation, while under negative symmetric inter-group effects (based perhaps on race, religion, status etc.) segmentation is preferred. Our contribution lies in the examination of joint consumption versus segmentation under asymmetric inter-group effects, with and without price discrimination. This can occur when non-homogeneous groups share the same residency, school or other local public institutions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1142278574&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9957.2004.00384.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9957.2004.00384.x
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
SN - 1463-6786
VL - 72
SP - 131
EP - 151
JO - Manchester School
JF - Manchester School
IS - 1
ER -