TY - JOUR
T1 - Sampling Bias From Satellite Retrieval Failures of Cloud Properties and Its Implications for Aerosol-Cloud Interactions
AU - Choudhury, Goutam
AU - Goren, Tom
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025. The Author(s).
PY - 2025/5/28
Y1 - 2025/5/28
N2 - Satellite radiometers like MODIS use a bi-spectral retrieval algorithm to simultaneously retrieve cloud optical thickness and cloud effective radius (Formula presented.). However, retrievals fail for liquid clouds when the (Formula presented.) observation exceeds the maximum threshold of 30 (Formula presented.) m in MODIS's solution space, leading to a sampling bias. Here, we quantify this bias by reconstructing pixels with failed retrievals using two methods: a conservative approach assigning a fixed minimum (Formula presented.) threshold to failed pixels, and a representative approach modeling failed (Formula presented.) using CloudSat radar measurements. We show that MODIS overestimates cloud droplet number concentration by 8%–9% and underestimates liquid water path by 8%–11% globally. We demonstrate that this bias can introduce erroneous correlations between cloud properties that may be misinterpreted as causal processes. Accordingly, we show that accounting for this bias increases the cloud water adjustments by 24%–36%, highlighting the crucial need to expand the solution space in MODIS and similar sensors.
AB - Satellite radiometers like MODIS use a bi-spectral retrieval algorithm to simultaneously retrieve cloud optical thickness and cloud effective radius (Formula presented.). However, retrievals fail for liquid clouds when the (Formula presented.) observation exceeds the maximum threshold of 30 (Formula presented.) m in MODIS's solution space, leading to a sampling bias. Here, we quantify this bias by reconstructing pixels with failed retrievals using two methods: a conservative approach assigning a fixed minimum (Formula presented.) threshold to failed pixels, and a representative approach modeling failed (Formula presented.) using CloudSat radar measurements. We show that MODIS overestimates cloud droplet number concentration by 8%–9% and underestimates liquid water path by 8%–11% globally. We demonstrate that this bias can introduce erroneous correlations between cloud properties that may be misinterpreted as causal processes. Accordingly, we show that accounting for this bias increases the cloud water adjustments by 24%–36%, highlighting the crucial need to expand the solution space in MODIS and similar sensors.
KW - CloudSat radar
KW - MODIS retrieval failure
KW - aerosol-cloud interactions
KW - bi-spectral retrieval
KW - cloud water adjustments
KW - sampling bias
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005658289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2025GL115429
DO - 10.1029/2025GL115429
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:105005658289
SN - 0094-8276
VL - 52
JO - Geophysical Research Letters
JF - Geophysical Research Letters
IS - 10
M1 - e2025GL115429
ER -