Abstract
This article addresses democratic peace practices in a multi-actor arena. It introduces a typology of international crises and spells out hypotheses on patterns of interstate violence in situations with state adversaries alone compared with those with states and non-state actors (NSAs). The findings on 447 International Crisis Behavior (ICB) crises, from 1918 to 2005, show that about half of the cases were multi-actor in type, both within and outside the democratic zone. The democratic peace assertions were supported in crises with states alone, shuttered but still persisted in multi-actor cases with ethnic NSAs, and reversed in multi-actor confrontations with non-ethnic NSAs. These findings make actor diversity a challenging theoretical refinement for democratic peace research on crisis and war.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 706-732 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | International Politics |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- democratic peace
- ethnic actors
- international crises
- non-state actors
- violence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting the democratic peace practice: Interstate violence in multi-actor crises, 1918-2005'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver