Remodeling Just Compensation: Applying Restorative Justice to Takings Law Doctrine

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Compensation for expropriation in most western jurisdictions aims to provide justice. Yet, while this quest for justice is inherent in expropriation laws, they nevertheless say little, if any, about the underlying conception of justice or how justice should be pursued. A closer examination of courts' judgments, as well as scholarly discourse on the quest for justice in expropriations reveals a muddled dialogue in which divergent justifications pull one towards different normative and positive conclusions. Currently, expropriation doctrine purports to incorporate a sense of fair dealings with those who become victim to legal devices such as eminent domain. However, based on current case law, the reality of expropriation laws fails to reflect any true practice of justice. This Article suggests a conceptual change in expropriation laws' remedial scheme by embracing restorative justice as the underlying concept of what constitutes justice in expropriation law. By establishing expropriation law on a restorative conception of justice, a coherent framework will emerge that is circumstances attentive and will provide practical instruments to overcome some of current law's most significant challenges. This opens a new venue for both expropriation law and restorative justice. Equally important, the Article provides a novel opportunity to consider restorative justice beyond the borders of criminal law.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-441
Number of pages29
JournalCanadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence.


Dive into the research topics of 'Remodeling Just Compensation: Applying Restorative Justice to Takings Law Doctrine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this