Abstract
Of all basic principles of classical physics, realism should arguably be the last to be given up when seeking a better interpretation of quantum mechanics. We examine the de Broglie-Bohm pilot wave theory as a well-developed example of a realistic theory. We present three challenges to a naive reading of pilot wave theory, each based on a system of several entangled particles. With the help of a coarse graining of pilot wave theory into a discrete system, we show how these challenges can be answered. However, this comes with a cost. In the description of individual systems, particles appear to scatter off empty branches of the wave function as if they were particles and conversely travel through particles as if they were waves. More generally, the "particles"of pilot wave theory are led by the guidance equation to move in ways no classical particle would, involving apparent violations of the principles of inertia and momentum conservation. We next argue that the aforementioned cost can be avoided within a retrocausal model. In the proposed version of the pilot wave theory, the particle is guided by a combination of advanced and retarded waves. The resulting account for quantum physics seems to have greater heuristic power, demands less damage to intuition, and moreover provides some general hints regarding spacetime and causality. This is the first of two papers. In the second [E. Cohen, M. Cortês, A. C. Elitzur, and L. Smolin, Realism and causality. II. Retrocausality in energetic causal sets, Phys. Rev. D 102, 124028 (2020).PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.102.124028], we show that, in the context of an explicit model, retrocausality, with respect to an effective, emergent spacetime metric, can coexist with a strict irreversibility of causal processes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 124027 |
| Journal | Physical Review D |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 9 Dec 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 American Physical Society.
Funding
We are grateful to Yakir Aharonov, Andrew Liddle, and Antony Valentini for many helpful discussions. We also wish to thank an anonymous referee for many helpful comments. This research was supported in part by Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. Research at Perimeter Institute was supported by the Government of Canada through Industry Canada and by the Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Research and Innovation. This research was also partly supported by grants from NSERC and FQXi. The work of M. C. was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through the Grant No. SFRH/BPD/111010/2015 (Portugal). L. S. and M. C. are especially thankful to the John Templeton Foundation for their generous support of this project. Further, this work was also supported by FCT through the research Grant No. UID/FIS/04434/2013. E. C. was supported by the Israel Innovation Authority, grant number 70002 and by the Quantum Science and Technology 2020 Program of the Israeli Council of Higher Education.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Israel Innovation Authority | 70002 |
| Israeli Council of Higher Education | |
| Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics | |
| John Templeton Foundation | UID/FIS/04434/2013 |
| Foundational Questions Institute | |
| Government of Canada | |
| Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada | |
| Industry Canada | |
| Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia para Excitotoxicidade e Neuroproteção | |
| Fundació Catalana de Trasplantament | SFRH/BPD/111010/2015 |
| Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation |