Questioning the fetal microbiome illustrates pitfalls of low-biomass microbial studies

Katherine M. Kennedy, Marcus C. de Goffau, Maria Elisa Perez-Muñoz, Marie Claire Arrieta, Fredrik Bäckhed, Peer Bork, Thorsten Braun, Frederic D. Bushman, Joel Dore, Willem M. de Vos, Ashlee M. Earl, Jonathan A. Eisen, Michal A. Elovitz, Stephanie C. Ganal-Vonarburg, Michael G. Gänzle, Wendy S. Garrett, Lindsay J. Hall, Mathias W. Hornef, Curtis Huttenhower, Liza KonnikovaSarah Lebeer, Andrew J. Macpherson, Ruth C. Massey, Alice Carolyn McHardy, Omry Koren, Trevor D. Lawley, Ruth E. Ley, Liam O’Mahony, Paul W. O’Toole, Eric G. Pamer, Julian Parkhill, Jeroen Raes, Thomas Rattei, Anne Salonen, Eran Segal, Nicola Segata, Fergus Shanahan, Deborah M. Sloboda, Gordon C.S. Smith, Harry Sokol, Tim D. Spector, Michael G. Surette, Gerald W. Tannock, Alan W. Walker, Moran Yassour, Jens Walter

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

147 Scopus citations

Abstract

Whether the human fetus and the prenatal intrauterine environment (amniotic fluid and placenta) are stably colonized by microbial communities in a healthy pregnancy remains a subject of debate. Here we evaluate recent studies that characterized microbial populations in human fetuses from the perspectives of reproductive biology, microbial ecology, bioinformatics, immunology, clinical microbiology and gnotobiology, and assess possible mechanisms by which the fetus might interact with microorganisms. Our analysis indicates that the detected microbial signals are likely the result of contamination during the clinical procedures to obtain fetal samples or during DNA extraction and DNA sequencing. Furthermore, the existence of live and replicating microbial populations in healthy fetal tissues is not compatible with fundamental concepts of immunology, clinical microbiology and the derivation of germ-free mammals. These conclusions are important to our understanding of human immune development and illustrate common pitfalls in the microbial analyses of many other low-biomass environments. The pursuit of a fetal microbiome serves as a cautionary example of the challenges of sequence-based microbiome studies when biomass is low or absent, and emphasizes the need for a trans-disciplinary approach that goes beyond contamination controls by also incorporating biological, ecological and mechanistic concepts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)639-649
Number of pages11
JournalNature
Volume613
Issue number7945
DOIs
StatePublished - 26 Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Springer Nature Limited.

Funding

T.B. receives funding from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation no. BR2925 10-1 & PL241 16-1). F.D.B. is funded by AI045008, AI120489, R33HL137063, CA219871, AI139240, and the PennCHOP Microbiome Program. J.D. acknowledges funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement ERC-2017-AdG no. 788191—Homo.symbiosus). W.M.d.V. is supported by the Gravitation grant 024.002.002 of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. W.M.d.V. and A.S. are supported by the Academy of Finland (grants 1308255 and 1325103). A.M.E. is funded in part with Federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under grant number U19AI110818 to the Broad Institute. M.A.E. is funded through grants R01HD102318, R01HD098867 and R01NR014784. S.C.G.-V. was funded through a Peter Hans Hofschneider Professorship provided by the Stiftung Molekulare Biomedizin. M.G.G. and D.M.S are funded by the Canada Research Chairs Program. L.J.H. is supported by Wellcome Trust Investigator Awards 100974/C/13/Z and 220876/Z/20/Z and by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Institute Strategic Programme Gut Microbes and Health BB/R012490/1 and its constituent projects BBS/E/F/000PR10353 and BBS/E/F/000PR10356. M.W.H. has received funding from the ERC under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 101019157). S.L. has received funding from the ERC under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement 852600 Lacto-Be). A.J.M. receives funding from ERCAd HHMM-Neonates and Swiss National Science Sinergia. O.K. is supported by the ERC under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement ERC-2020-COG no. 101001355). Work in the laboratories of P.W.O., L.O. and J.W. is supported by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) through a Centre award (APC/SFI/12/RC/2273_P2) to APC Microbiome Ireland. J.W. acknowledges support through an SFI Professorship (19/RP/6853) and thanks V. McMahon for coordination of this review and R. O’Callaghan for encouragement. J.R. acknowledges funding from the Interuniversity Special Research Fund (iBOF) Flanders (FLEXIGUT R-11423), the Rega Institute, VIB and KU Leuven. N.S. receives funding from the ERC (ERC-STG project MetaPG-716575 and ERC-CoG microTOUCH-101045015) and from the European H2020 program (ONCOBIOME-825410 project, MASTER-818368 project and IHMCSA-964590). F.S. is supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland. G.C.S.S. acknowledges funding from the Medical Research Council (UK; MR/K021133/1) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (Women’s Health theme). D.M.S. is funded by the Canadian Institute for Health Research and the Canada Research Chairs Program. A.W.W. receives core funding support from the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS). M.Y. is supported by the Azrieli Faculty Fellowship.

FundersFunder number
ERC-STGMetaPG-716575, ERC-CoG microTOUCH-101045015
European H2020 programMASTER-818368, ONCOBIOME-825410, IHMCSA-964590
Interuniversity Special Research Fund
Rega Institute
Stiftung Molekulare Biomedizin
Swiss National Science Sinergia101001355, ERC-2020-COG
Women’s Health theme
National Institutes of Health
U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesU19AI110818
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Wellcome Trust220876/Z/20/Z, 100974/C/13/Z
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme024.002.002, 788191
Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division
Broad InstituteR01HD102318, R01NR014784, R01HD098867
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Medical Research CouncilMR/K021133/1
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilBB/R012490/1, BBS/E/F/000PR10353, 101019157, BBS/E/F/000PR10356, 852600 Lacto-Be
National Institute for Health and Care Research
European Commission
Science Foundation IrelandAPC/SFI/12/RC/2273_P2
Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAI139240, CA219871, BR2925 10-1, R33HL137063, AI120489, PL241 16-1, AI045008
Canada Research Chairs
Academy of Finland1325103, 1308255
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KU Leuven
Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie
UCLH Biomedical Research Centre
iBOFFLEXIGUT R-11423

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Questioning the fetal microbiome illustrates pitfalls of low-biomass microbial studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this