Abstract
An understanding of the mechanisms that facilitate coexistence in ecological communities poses a major challenge to theoretical ecology. A popular paradigmatic scheme distinguishes between two qualitatively different processes that help species to coexist: stabilizing mechanisms increase niche differentiation, making the in-traspecific competition stronger than the interspecific one, while equalizing mechanisms diminish fitness differences, making the competition less decisive. Here, we provide an analytic and numeric examination of the quantitative features associated with this scheme for a simple, two-species competition model. We show that the main metrics of persistence change only slightly along the stabilizing-equalizing con-tinuum, where niche overlap increases while fitness differences de-creases. Therefore, persistence properties cannot indicate the dominant mechanism that promotes coexistence and vice versa. Cross correlations between abundance time series are shown to provide a decent characterization of the mechanisms that promote coexistence. The relevance of these insights to the analysis of diverse assemblages is discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | E160-E173 |
| Journal | American Naturalist |
| Volume | 200 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 The University of Chicago.
Funding
This research was supported by Israel Ministry of Agriculture (Israel-Japan Program) grant 16-38-0018.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development | 16-38-0018 |
Keywords
- coexistence
- competition
- modern coexistence theory
- niche-neutral continuum
- stabilizing and equalizing mechanisms
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative Characteristics of Stabilizing and Equalizing Mechanisms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver