“Putting gender on the table”: Understanding reactions to women who discuss gender inequality

Moran Anisman-Razin, Ronit Kark, Tamar Saguy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Even though gender inequality remains an important challenge across societies, many believe it to be long gone (Marken, 2016). Thus, it is essential to publicly address issues related to gender inequality as a first step towards advancing change in this domain. However, those who address gender inequality may encounter personal costs. In the current research, we examined reactions to women who “put gender on the table.” In Study 1 (N = 202), men who were exposed to a woman who raised the issue of gender inequality (vs. age inequality or a neutral topic), had more negative attitudes towards both her and gender equality. In Study 2, (N = 233), women high on feminist identification were more positive toward a woman who discussed gender inequality (vs. other topics), whereas women low on feminist identification were more negative toward both her and the issue. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)690-706
Number of pages17
JournalGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the Israeli Ministry of Science, Technology and Space, through a scholarship given to Moran Anisman-Razin (No. 3-11716).

FundersFunder number
Ministry of Science, Technology and Space3-11716

    Keywords

    • addressing gender inequality
    • feminist identification
    • gender

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '“Putting gender on the table”: Understanding reactions to women who discuss gender inequality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this