Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Public and Private Rulings in Jewish Law (Halakhah): Flexibility, Concealment, and Feminist Jurisprudence

  • Shalom Hartman Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Jewish law includes two parallel systems of halakhic ruling: public and private. There is often a significant gap between what halakhic authorities proclaim publicly and what they are willing to say, on the same topic, in private. The ability to deviate from the original ruling in order to solve concrete problems answers one of the central demands of feminist critics of the law. It enables flexibility and creativity on the part of the decisor and avoids the characteristic pitfalls of the generalized nature of the law, which, according to feminist critics, affect primarily women. On the face of it, halakhah works in this flexible mode. However, the selective concealment mechanism built into the halakhic system prevents this benefit from being felt, primarily by disadvantaged populations. In its absence Jewish law may be capable, at least in principle, of instituting a halakhic model which responds to inherent problems within the two parallel systems of halakhah as well as to feminist sensibilities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-50
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Law, Religion and State
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Keywords

  • Jewish law (halakhah)
  • feminist jurisprudence
  • halakhic decisor
  • private/public rulings
  • selective concealment
  • slippery slope

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public and Private Rulings in Jewish Law (Halakhah): Flexibility, Concealment, and Feminist Jurisprudence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this