Abstract
This article discusses what I call the proxy narrative, a type of narrative in which a key scene or plot sequence can be read most meaningfully as a substitute for a counterfactual alternative that cannot otherwise be narrated. Building on existing critical applications of possible world semantics and counterfactual reasoning to narrative theory, I offer several case studies culminating in an extended discussion of The Ambassadors-and, particularly, of its critically contested final scene-to illustrate the extent to which recognition of the proxy narratives embedded in traditional plots can enrich our readings of even the most familiar texts. Unable plausibly or ethically to depict a renunciation scene between Strether and Madame de Vionnet, James uses the final encounter between Strether and Maria Gostrey, I argue, to enact a discursively necessary outcome that the logic of story otherwise precludes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 28-49 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Narrative |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2016 by The Ohio State University.
Keywords
- Counterfactual plot
- Henry james
- Possible world semantics
- Proxy narrative
- The ambassadors