Protection for Informational Works After Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	611-670
Number of pages	60
Journal	Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
Volume	21
State	Published - 2011

Cite this

• APA
• Author
• BIBTEX
• Harvard
• Standard
• RIS
• Vancouver

Markowitz-Bitton, M. (2011). Protection for Informational Works After Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 21, 611-670.

Markowitz-Bitton, M. / Protection for Informational Works After Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service. In: Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal. 2011 ; Vol. 21. pp. 611-670.

@article{29161cedc6fb4bfc9182cb97367d476e,

title = "Protection for Informational Works After Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service",

author = "M. Markowitz-Bitton",

year = "2011",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "21",

pages = "611--670",

journal = "Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal",

}

Markowitz-Bitton, M 2011, 'Protection for Informational Works After Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service', Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, vol. 21, pp. 611-670.

Protection for Informational Works After Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service. / Markowitz-Bitton, M.
In: Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 21, 2011, p. 611-670.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protection for Informational Works After Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service

AU - Markowitz-Bitton, M.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

VL - 21

SP - 611

EP - 670

JO - Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

JF - Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

ER -

Markowitz-Bitton M. Protection for Informational Works After Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal. 2011;21:611-670.