TY - JOUR
T1 - Propofol sedation in colonoscopy
T2 - From satisfied patients to improved quality indicators
AU - Baker, Fadi Abu
AU - Mari, Amir
AU - Aamarney, Kamal
AU - Hakeem, Abu Ras
AU - Ovadia, Barouch
AU - Kopelman, Yael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Abu Baker et al.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: Propofol-mediated sedation is safe and clearly associated with increased patient satisfaction. However, whether it results in a favorable effect on colonoscopy outcomes and performance compared to standard sedation with benzodiazepines/opiates remains unclear. Objectives: To determine the effect of propofol-mediated sedation on colonoscopy-quality measures compared to traditional sedation. Methods: A large cohort of 44,794 patients who had undergone sedated colonoscopies were included. Colonoscopy-quality indicators were examined in benzodiazepine/opiate-sedated patients and compared with a propofol-mediated sedation group. Adjustment for potential confounders, such as age, sex, quality of bowel preparation, procedural setting, and indication was performed. Results: Patients who received propofol-mediated sedation were more likely, and in a dose-dependent manner, to have an enhanced polyp-detection rate (22.8% vs 20.9%, P<0.001), cecal intubation rate (90.4% vs 87.3%, P<0.001), and terminal ileum-intubation rate (6.4% vs 1.6%, P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, these findings were maintained, as propofol-mediated sedation use was significantly associated with improved colonoscopy indicators. Conclusion: Propofol-mediated sedation during colonoscopy is associated with better examination performance and improved outcomes. Further prospective or randomized trials to support these findings are warranted.
AB - Background: Propofol-mediated sedation is safe and clearly associated with increased patient satisfaction. However, whether it results in a favorable effect on colonoscopy outcomes and performance compared to standard sedation with benzodiazepines/opiates remains unclear. Objectives: To determine the effect of propofol-mediated sedation on colonoscopy-quality measures compared to traditional sedation. Methods: A large cohort of 44,794 patients who had undergone sedated colonoscopies were included. Colonoscopy-quality indicators were examined in benzodiazepine/opiate-sedated patients and compared with a propofol-mediated sedation group. Adjustment for potential confounders, such as age, sex, quality of bowel preparation, procedural setting, and indication was performed. Results: Patients who received propofol-mediated sedation were more likely, and in a dose-dependent manner, to have an enhanced polyp-detection rate (22.8% vs 20.9%, P<0.001), cecal intubation rate (90.4% vs 87.3%, P<0.001), and terminal ileum-intubation rate (6.4% vs 1.6%, P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, these findings were maintained, as propofol-mediated sedation use was significantly associated with improved colonoscopy indicators. Conclusion: Propofol-mediated sedation during colonoscopy is associated with better examination performance and improved outcomes. Further prospective or randomized trials to support these findings are warranted.
KW - Cecal intubation rate
KW - Colonoscopy
KW - Polyp-detection rate
KW - Propofol-mediated sedation
KW - Quality indicators
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063511961&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2147/CEG.S186393
DO - 10.2147/CEG.S186393
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 30881077
AN - SCOPUS:85063511961
SN - 1178-7023
VL - 12
SP - 105
EP - 110
JO - Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
JF - Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
ER -