Abstract
The paper examines a passage in the Talmud regarding the attitude of Jewish Law toward the earnings of a married women. Considering a wife and her husband as two consumers who have preferences over income and "good feelings," it analyzes a controversy in the Gemara over the distribution of the wife's earnings. Using economic tools the paper shows that a rule enabling the wife to trade her earnings only in terms of "all or nothing" actually imposes a Pareto-optimal allocation within the family, one that is unlikely to resuh from a negotiated agreement.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 57-67 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Contemporary Jewry |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1999 |