Abstract
With data from 2 large randomized British Medical Research Council studies we identified several factors influencing the recurrence of newly diagnosed superficial bladder cancer. Using multivariate methods to assess the relative importance of these factors we found the most important to be the result of cystoscopy performed 3 months after initial transurethral resection and the number of tumors (single or multiple) at presentation. With these 2 factors we divided the patient population into 3 groups with varying degress of prognosis. Different follow-up procedures are proposed for each of these 3 groups.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 284-288 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Urology |
| Volume | 142 |
| Issue number | 2 I |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1989 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic factors for recurrence and follow-up policies in the treatment of superficial bladder cancer: Report from the British Medical Research Council subgroup on superficial bladder cancer (urological cancer working party)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver