Poverty, government policy and public opinion in Britain and Israel: A comparative analysis

Menachem Monnickendam, David Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

What are the effects of public opinion on social welfare policies? To what extent is increased financial strain associated with stronger support for anti-poverty policies? This article tests welfare state theory by comparing poverty, government policy and public opinion on poverty in the UK and Israel, based on rich and detailed comparable survey data on the conditions of the poor in both countries. The results show that, despite similar levels of income poverty and inequality, the poor have a considerably lower standard of living in Israel than the UK. There is considerably greater public support for the poor in Israel but limited government action to end poverty, whereas in the UK there is more limited public support for the poor but significant government action on poverty and exclusion. In both countries there appears to be only a limited connection between social solidarity with the poor and the political elite's rhetoric and action.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)554-574
Number of pages21
JournalSocial Policy and Administration
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Keywords

  • Comparative research
  • Deprivation
  • Depth of poverty
  • Exclusion
  • Power resources theory
  • Public opinion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Poverty, government policy and public opinion in Britain and Israel: A comparative analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this