Abstract
In this paper we introduce a distinction between two forms of planning: Just-in-Case planning versus Just-in-Time planning. The first refers to the traditional mode of planning as currently practiced in most urban and regional planning agencies, whereas the second, is what planning in a self-organizing system might be. The key notion behind this distinction is Just-in-Time-a method of production and management that marks the current transformation from 20th century Fordism to 21st century post-Fordism. In our paper we relate this distinction to the Israeli planning experience and suggest preliminary principles for a new, Just-in-Time, planning approach.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 29-39 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Cities |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Beer-Sheeva
- Housing
- Israel
- Tel-Aviv
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Planning Just-in-Time versus planning Just-in-Case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver