Personality traits in psychotic illness and their clinical correlates: A systematic review

Anne Neeltje Scholte-Stalenhoef, Gerdina Hendrika Maria Pijnenborg, Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon, Lindy Lou Boyette

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This systematic review focuses on personality traits according to both the Five Factor Model and Cloninger Psychobiological Model in relation to treatment related outcome variables across all stages of clinical psychotic illness. Search of Pubmed and Psychinfo databases led to final inclusion of 65 studies, which were ranked on quality and analyzed according to the associations between personality and outcome. Main findings are that higher levels of Harm Avoidance and Neuroticism are associated with higher symptom levels, tendency towards passive coping, greater self-stigma, lower quality of life, and Harm Avoidance to higher suicidality. Higher levels of Extraversion and higher levels of Self-Directedness are associated with more preference for active coping, more intrinsic motivation and higher self-esteem. Higher Novelty Seeking is related to more substance use and aggression, in men specifically. On outcome of trauma, care consumption and duration of untreated illness no consistent associations with personality traits were found. Combined evidence from both personality models however reveals a consistent pattern of personality traits related to clinical outcome in psychotic disorder, which is discussed in a dimensional manner.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)348-406
Number of pages59
JournalSchizophrenia Research
Volume252
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors

Funding

Julia Scholte illustrated Fig. 2, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4. Non applicable.

Keywords

  • Character
  • Cloninger psychobiological model
  • Five factor model
  • Personality
  • Psychosis
  • Temperament

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personality traits in psychotic illness and their clinical correlates: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this