TY - JOUR
T1 - Perinatal management of women with immune thrombocytopenic purpura
T2 - Survey of United States perinatologists
AU - Peleg, D.
AU - Hunter, S. K.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine how perinatologists in the United States manage the care of women with immune thrombocytopenic purpura with respect to mode of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: US members of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians were surveyed with a 4-question questionnaire. Two mailings were sent. Questions 1 and 2 asked for a response regarding the perinatal management of delivery for women with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura and new-onset disease. The options were cordocentesis or fetal scalp blood sampling and cesarean delivery if the platelet count was <50,000 cells/μL, cesarean delivery if the maternal platelet count was <50,000 cells/μL, cesarean delivery of all women with immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and trial of labor without determining fetal platelet count. The third question asked for an opinion on whether cesarean delivery was protective against intracranial hemorrhage in cases of immune thrombocytopenic purpura. The fourth question asked whether the practitioner was in academic or private practice or both. RESULTS: Among the 1596 perinatologists surveyed, there were 940 informative responses (58.9%). Most would allow a trial of labor for women with chronic (59.0%) or new-onset (66.6%) immune thrombocytopenic purpura. In cases of chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura, 31.0% of those responding would perform an invasive procedure to determine fetal platelet count, followed by cesarean delivery if this count was <50,000 cells/μL. In cases of new-onset immune thrombocytopenic purpura, 25.4% would do so. Of the respondents, 11.8% reportedly considered cesarean delivery protective against intracranial hemorrhage, whereas 56.6% did not and 31.6% were unsure. CONCLUSIONS: The management of women with immune thrombocytopenic purpura remains controversial in the United States. Approximately two thirds of perinatologists would allow a trial of labor without a procedure to determine fetal platelet count. Most physicians surveyed did not consider cesarean delivery to be protective against intracranial hemorrhage.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine how perinatologists in the United States manage the care of women with immune thrombocytopenic purpura with respect to mode of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: US members of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians were surveyed with a 4-question questionnaire. Two mailings were sent. Questions 1 and 2 asked for a response regarding the perinatal management of delivery for women with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura and new-onset disease. The options were cordocentesis or fetal scalp blood sampling and cesarean delivery if the platelet count was <50,000 cells/μL, cesarean delivery if the maternal platelet count was <50,000 cells/μL, cesarean delivery of all women with immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and trial of labor without determining fetal platelet count. The third question asked for an opinion on whether cesarean delivery was protective against intracranial hemorrhage in cases of immune thrombocytopenic purpura. The fourth question asked whether the practitioner was in academic or private practice or both. RESULTS: Among the 1596 perinatologists surveyed, there were 940 informative responses (58.9%). Most would allow a trial of labor for women with chronic (59.0%) or new-onset (66.6%) immune thrombocytopenic purpura. In cases of chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura, 31.0% of those responding would perform an invasive procedure to determine fetal platelet count, followed by cesarean delivery if this count was <50,000 cells/μL. In cases of new-onset immune thrombocytopenic purpura, 25.4% would do so. Of the respondents, 11.8% reportedly considered cesarean delivery protective against intracranial hemorrhage, whereas 56.6% did not and 31.6% were unsure. CONCLUSIONS: The management of women with immune thrombocytopenic purpura remains controversial in the United States. Approximately two thirds of perinatologists would allow a trial of labor without a procedure to determine fetal platelet count. Most physicians surveyed did not consider cesarean delivery to be protective against intracranial hemorrhage.
KW - Cesarean delivery
KW - Cordocentesis
KW - Immune thrombocytopenic purpura
KW - Intracranial hemorrhage
KW - Management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033053062&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70286-3
DO - 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70286-3
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 10076142
AN - SCOPUS:0033053062
SN - 0002-9378
VL - 180
SP - 645
EP - 649
JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 3 I
ER -