Perception measurement in clinical trials of schizophrenia: Promising paradigms from CNTRICS

Michael F. Green, Pamela D. Butler, Yue Chen, Mark A. Geyer, Steven Silverstein, Jonathan K. Wynn, Jong H. Yoon, Vance Zemon

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

96 Scopus citations


The third meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (CNTRICS) focused on selecting promising measures for each of the cognitive constructs selected in the first CNTRICS meeting. In the domain of perception, the 2 constructs of interest were gain control and visual integration. CNTRICS received 5 task nominations for gain control and three task nominations for visual integration. The breakout group for perception evaluated the degree to which each of these tasks met prespecified criteria. For gain control, the breakout group for perception believed that 2 of the tasks (prepulse inhibition of startle and mismatch negativity) were already mature and in the process of being incorporated into multisite clinical trials. However, the breakout group recommended that steady-state visual-evoked potentials be combined with contrast sensitivity to magnocellular vs parvocellular biased stimuli and that this combined task and the contrast-contrast effect task be recommended for translation for use in clinical trial contexts in schizophrenia research. For visual integration, the breakout group recommended the Contour Integration and Coherent Motion tasks for translation for use in clinical trials. This manuscript describes the ways in which each of these tasks met the criteria used by the breakout group to evaluate and recommend tasks for further development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-181
Number of pages19
JournalSchizophrenia Bulletin
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes


  • Perception
  • Sensory processes


Dive into the research topics of 'Perception measurement in clinical trials of schizophrenia: Promising paradigms from CNTRICS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this