PC                         20                          versus PD                         20: Why change a scientifically well-established and clinically relevant test?

Israel Amirav; Michael T. Newhouse

doi:10.1164/rccm.201809-1765LE

PC ₂₀ versus PD ₂₀: Why change a scientifically well-established and clinically relevant test?

Israel Amirav
, Michael T. Newhouse

University of Alberta
Dana Children's Hospital
McMaster University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1037-1038
Number of pages	2
Journal	American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume	199
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201809-1765LE
State	Published - 15 Apr 2019
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1164/rccm.201809-1765LE

Cite this

@article{d1892b6c3e654fffa03327730880c693,

title = "PC 20 versus PD 20: Why change a scientifically well-established and clinically relevant test?",

author = "Israel Amirav and Newhouse, \{Michael T.\}",

year = "2019",

month = apr,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1164/rccm.201809-1765LE",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "199",

pages = "1037--1038",

journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",

issn = "1073-449X",

publisher = "American Thoracic Society",

number = "8",

}

PC ₂₀ versus PD ₂₀: Why change a scientifically well-established and clinically relevant test? / Amirav, Israel; Newhouse, Michael T.
In: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 199, No. 8, 15.04.2019, p. 1037-1038.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - PC 20 versus PD 20

T2 - Why change a scientifically well-established and clinically relevant test?

AU - Amirav, Israel

AU - Newhouse, Michael T.

PY - 2019/4/15

Y1 - 2019/4/15

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064404685

U2 - 10.1164/rccm.201809-1765LE

DO - 10.1164/rccm.201809-1765LE

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.letter???

C2 - 30640509

AN - SCOPUS:85064404685

SN - 1073-449X

VL - 199

SP - 1037

EP - 1038

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

IS - 8

ER -

PC 20 versus PD 20: Why change a scientifically well-established and clinically relevant test?

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this

PC ₂₀ versus PD ₂₀: Why change a scientifically well-established and clinically relevant test?