TY - JOUR
T1 - Paper or plastic revisited: Let's keep them both - Reply to Broderick and Stone (2006); Tennen, Affleck, Coyne, Larsen, and DeLongis (2006); And Takarangi, Garry, and Loftus (2006),
AU - Bolger, N.
AU - Shrout, P.E.
AU - Green, A.S.
AU - Rafaeli, E.
AU - Reis, H.T.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - The authors review commentaries by J. E. Broderick and A. A. Stone (2006)(see record 2006-03820-007); H. Tennen, G. Affleck, J. C. Coyne, R. J. Larsen, and A. DeLongis (2006)(see record 2006-03820-008); and M. K. T. Takarangi, M. Garry, and E. F. Loftus (2006)(see record 2006-03820-009) on their original article (A. S. Green, E. Rafaeli, N. Bolger, P. Shrout, \& H. T. Reis, 2006)(see record 2006-03820-006). The authors were pleased to find more agreement than disagreement regarding the choice of methods for conducting diary studies. It is clear that continued critical evaluation of all diary methods, both paper and plastic, is warranted. However, on the basis of their initial findings, the authors conclude that paper diaries are still likely to have a valuable place in researchers' toolboxes. Copyright 2006 by the American Psychological Association.,
AB - The authors review commentaries by J. E. Broderick and A. A. Stone (2006)(see record 2006-03820-007); H. Tennen, G. Affleck, J. C. Coyne, R. J. Larsen, and A. DeLongis (2006)(see record 2006-03820-008); and M. K. T. Takarangi, M. Garry, and E. F. Loftus (2006)(see record 2006-03820-009) on their original article (A. S. Green, E. Rafaeli, N. Bolger, P. Shrout, \& H. T. Reis, 2006)(see record 2006-03820-006). The authors were pleased to find more agreement than disagreement regarding the choice of methods for conducting diary studies. It is clear that continued critical evaluation of all diary methods, both paper and plastic, is warranted. However, on the basis of their initial findings, the authors conclude that paper diaries are still likely to have a valuable place in researchers' toolboxes. Copyright 2006 by the American Psychological Association.,
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33746118654&doi=10.1037%2f1082-989X.11.1.123&partnerID=40&md5=9265bf18b9b48720dcd3afdaf5d14a45,
UR - http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=3&hl=en&lr=&q=allintitle%3A%20Paper%20or%20plastic%20revisited%3A%20Let%27s%20keep%20them%20both%20-%20Reply%20to%20Broderick%20and%20Stone%20%282006%29%3B%20Tennen%2C%20Affleck%2C%20Coyne%2C%20Larsen%2C%20and%20DeLongis%20%282006%29%3B%20And%20Takarangi%2C%20Garry%2C%20and%20Loftus%20%282006%29%2C%20author%3ABolger%20OR%20author%3AP.E.%20OR%20author%3AShrout%20OR%20author%3AA.S.%20OR%20author%3AGreen%20OR%20author%3ARafaeli%20OR%20author%3AH.T.%20OR%20author%3AReis&as_ylo=2006&as_yhi=&btnG=Search&as_vis=0
M3 - Article
VL - 11
SP - 123
EP - 125
JO - Psychological Methods,
JF - Psychological Methods,
IS - 1,
ER -