Abstract
The authors investigated the effects of online discussion embedded within metacognitive guidance on mathematical literacy and self-regulated learning (SRL). They compared 4 instructional methods: online discussion embedded within metacognitive guidance (Online+Meta), online discussion without metacognitive guidance (Online), face-to-face discussion with metacognitive guidance (Ftf+Meta), and face-to-face discussion without metacognitive guidance (Ftf). Participants were 86 seventh-grade Israeli boys and girls who practiced problem solving in 4 classes. Results showed that the Online+Meta students significantly outperformed the Ftf+Meta students, who, in turn, significantly outperformed the Online and Ftf students on mathematical literacy of standard tasks, real-life tasks, and various aspects of self-regulated learning. Regarding Online students, results were mixed; these students outperformed the Ftf students on part of the criteria for standard problem-solving standard tasks and real-life tasks. The authors found no significant differences between the Online and Ftf students on SRL. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 218-230 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Educational Research |
Volume | 99 |
Issue number | 4 |
State | Published - 1 Mar 2006 |
Bibliographical note
Accession Number: edsjsr.27548133; Publication Type: Academic Journal; Source: The Journal of Educational Research; Language: English; Publication Date: 20060301; Rights: Copyright 2006 Helen Dwight Reid Educational FoundationKeywords
- mathematical literacy
- online discussion
- self-regulated learning
- Numeracy
- Mathematics education
- Reasoning
- Problem solving
- Pretests
- Posttests
- Pizzas
- Online learning
- Learning
- Standard deviation