On the union of cylinders in three dimensions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

We show that the combinatorial complexity of the union of n infinite cylinders in ℝ3, having arbitrary radii, is O(n 2+ε), for any ε > 0; the bound is almost tight in the worst case, thus settling a conjecture of Agarwal and Sharir [3], who established a nearly-quadratic bound for the restricted case of nearly congruent cylinders. Our result extends, in a significant way, the result of Agarwal and Sharir [3], in particular, a simple specialization of our analysis to the case of nearly congruent cylinders yields a nearly-quadratic bound on the complexity of the union in that case, thus significantly simplifying the analysis in [3]. Finally, we extend our technique to the case of "cigars" of arbitrary radii (that is, Minkowski sums of line-segments and balls), and show that the combinatorial complexity of the union in this case is nearly-quadratic as well. This problem has been studied in [3] for the restricted case where all cigars are (nearly) equal-radii. Based on our new approach, the proof follows almost verbatim from the analysis for infinite cylinders, and is significantly simpler than the proof presented in [3].

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2008
Pages179-188
Number of pages10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes
Event49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2008 - Philadelphia, PA, United States
Duration: 25 Oct 200828 Oct 2008

Publication series

NameProceedings - Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS
ISSN (Print)0272-5428

Conference

Conference49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2008
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityPhiladelphia, PA
Period25/10/0828/10/08

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the union of cylinders in three dimensions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this