Abstract
Different scoring rules can result in the selection of any of the k competing candidates, given the same preference profile, (Saari DG 2001, Chaotic elections! A mathematician looks at voting. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I.). It is also possible that a candidate, and even a Condorcet winning candidate, cannot be selected by any scoring rule, (Saari DG 2000 Econ Theory 15:55-101). These findings are balanced by Saari's result (Saari DG 1992 Soc Choice Welf 9(4):277-306) that specifies the necessary and sufficient condition for the selection of the same candidate by all scoring rules. This condition is, however, indirect. We provide a sufficient condition that is stated directly in terms of the preference profile; therefore, its testability does not require the verdict of any voting rule.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 597-601 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Social Choice and Welfare |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2006 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the selection of the same winner by all scoring rules'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver