Abstract
In three experiments we examined whether songs that are widely used in times of
crisis (crisis songs, CS) could resume their unifying effect when they are played offcontext.
In the first experiment, two conflictual groups, religious and secular Jews,
were exposed to CS, to love songs (LS), or to no songs and were then asked to
express their attitudes towards their outgroups. It was found that CS positively
affected respondents' attitudes: stigmas and prejudice were lessened. In a second
experiment, the CS effect was examined under more restrictive conditions. Instead
of listening to CS, participants were asked to recall them from memory. In addition,
attitudes towards ingroups and outgroups were collected more systematically.
Results showed again that CS reduced intergroup bias. In a third experiment we
tried to understand the mechanism underlying the CS effect by examining the
thoughts and associations that people had while listening to CS. Analysis of the
associations showed that unifying themes such as "nationalism," "sorrow and
grief," and "unity" were most prominent when religious and secular respondents
listened to CS. The CS effect and its underlying mechanism are explained in light
of the "common ingroup identity model." CS had the power to bring into
awareness that the conflicting groups belong to one superordinate social group
which, in turn, reduced stigmas, prejudice, and intergroup bias. Possible implications
of these findings are discussed.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 85-115 |
Journal | Musicae Scientiae |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 1 |
State | Published - 2009 |