Abstract
Ill-posed linear inverse problems appear in many scientific setups and are typically addressed by solving optimization problems, which are composed of data fidelity and prior terms. Recently, several works have considered a back-projection (BP) based fidelity term as an alternative to the common least squares (LS) and demonstrated excellent results for popular inverse problems. These works have also empirically shown that using the BP term, rather than the LS term, requires fewer iterations of optimization algorithms. In this paper, we examine the convergence rate of the projected gradient descent algorithm for the BP objective. Our analysis allows us to identify an inherent source for its faster convergence compared to using the LS objective, while making only mild assumptions. We also analyze the more general proximal gradient method under a relaxed contraction condition on the proximal mapping of the prior. This analysis further highlights the advantage of BP when the linear measurement operator is badly conditioned. Numerical experiments with both ℓ1-norm and GAN based priors corroborate our theoretical results.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1504-1531 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© by SIAM. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Funding
∗Received by the editors March 26, 2021; accepted for publication (in revised form) August 5, 2021; published electronically October 18, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1137/21M1407902 Funding: The work of the authors was supported by the ERC-StG grant 757497 (SPADE) and gifts from NVIDIA, Amazon, and Google. †School of Electrical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Israel ([email protected], [email protected]).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
ERC-STG | 757497 |
NVIDIA |
Keywords
- image restoration
- inverse problems
- projected gradient descent
- proximal gradient method