Abstract
Social polarization refers to the measurement of the distance between different social groups, defined on the basis of variables such as race, religion, or ethnicity. We propose two approaches to measuring social polarization in the case where the distance between groups is based on an ordinal variable, such as self-assessed health status. The first one, the ‘stratification approach’, amounts to assessing the degree of non-overlapping of the distributions of the ordinal variable between the different population subgroups that are distinguished. The second one, the ‘antipodal approach’, considers that the social polarization of an ordinal variable will be maximal if the individuals belonging to a given population subgroup are in the same health category, this category corresponding either to the lowest or to the highest health status. An empirical illustration is provided using the 2009 cross-sectional data of the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC). We find that Estonia, Latvia, and Ireland have the highest degree of social polarization when the ordinal variable under scrutiny refers to self-assessed health status and the (unordered) population subgroups to the citizenship of the respondent whereas Luxembourg is the country with the lowest degree of social polarization in health.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 841-851 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | European Journal of Health Economics |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2014 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2013, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Funding
This paper was started when Jacques Silber was visiting professor at CEPS/INSTEAD which he thanks for its very warm hospitality. He also gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Adar Foundation of the Department of Economics of Bar-Ilan University. Core funding for CEPS/INSTEAD from the Ministry of Higher Education and Research of Luxembourg is gratefully acknowledged by Alessio Fusco. Both authors thank Gaston Yalonetzky for his very useful comments on a previous draft of this paper.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Alessio Fusco | |
Department of Economics of Bar-Ilan University | |
Ministry of Higher Education and Research of Luxembourg |
Keywords
- EU-SILC
- Migration
- Ordinal information
- Self-assessed health
- Social polarization