Abstract
Let α(G) denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while µ(G) be the size of a maximum matching in the graph G = (V, E). If α(G) + µ(G) = |V |, then G is a König-Egerváry graph. If d1 ≤ d2 ≤ · · · ≤ dn is the degree sequence of G, then the annihilation number a (G) of G is the largest integer k such that Pki=1 di ≤ |E|. A set A ⊆ V satisfying Pv∈A deg(v) ≤ |E| is an annihilation set; if, in addition, deg (x) + Pv∈A deg(v) > |E|, for every vertex x ∈ V (G) − A, then A is a maximal annihilation set in G. In 2011, Larson and Pepper conjectured that the following assertions are equivalent: (i) α (G) = a (G); (ii) G is a König-Egerváry graph and every maximum independent set is a maximal annihilating set. It turns out that the implication “(i) =≻ (ii)” is correct. In this paper, we show that the opposite direction is not valid, by providing a series of generic counterexamples.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 359-369 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Ars Mathematica Contemporanea |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:cb This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Keywords
- Annihilation number
- Annihilation set
- König-Egerváry graph
- Maximum independent set
- Maximum matching