Omidubicel vs standard myeloablative umbilical cord blood transplantation: results of a phase 3 randomized study

Mitchell E. Horwitz, Patrick J. Stiff, Corey Cutler, Claudio Brunstein, Rabi Hanna, Richard T. Maziarz, Andrew R. Rezvani, Nicole A. Karris, Joseph McGuirk, David Valcarcel, Gary J. Schiller, Caroline A. Lindemans, William Y.K. Hwang, Liang Piu Koh, Amy Keating, Yasser Khaled, Nelson Hamerschlak, Olga Frankfurt, Tony Peled, Irit SegalovichBeth Blackwell, Stephen Wease, Laurence S. Freedman, Einat Galamidi-Cohen, Guillermo Sanz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

Omidubicel is an ex vivo expanded hematopoietic progenitor cell and nonexpanded myeloid and lymphoid cell product derived from a single umbilical cord blood unit. We report results of a phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of omidubicel compared with standard umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Between January 2017 and January 2020, 125 patients age 13 to 65 years with hematologic malignancies were randomly assigned to omidubicel vs standard UCBT. Patients received myeloablative conditioning and prophylaxis with a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The primary end point was time to neutrophil engraftment. The treatment arms were well balanced and racially diverse. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 12 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 10-14 days) for the omidubicel arm and 22 days (95% CI, 19-25 days) for the control arm (P < .001). The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 96% for patients receiving omidubicel and 89% for patients receiving control transplants. The omidubicel arm had faster platelet recovery (55% vs 35% recovery by 42 days; P = .028), had a lower incidence of first grade 2 to 3 bacterial or invasive fungal infection (37% vs 57%; P = .027), and spent more time out of hospital during the first 100 days after transplant (median, 61 vs 48 days; P = .005) than controls. Differences in GVHD and survival between the 2 arms were not statistically significant. Transplantation with omidubicel results in faster hematopoietic recovery and reduces early transplant-related complications compared with standard UCBT. The results suggest that omidubicel may be considered as a new standard of care for adult patients eligible for UCBT. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02730299.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1429-1440
Number of pages12
JournalBlood
Volume138
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - 21 Oct 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society of Hematology

Funding

The authors thank Bruno Boulanger and Elena Maurer from BPE for their contribution to the CD34 correlative analyses, and Sarah Anderson, Alice Henning, Shashidhar Joshy, Laura Morrison, and Amarnath Vijayarangan from the Emmes Company for their support for statistical analyses. This work was supported by funding from Gamida Cell.

FundersFunder number
BPE

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Omidubicel vs standard myeloablative umbilical cord blood transplantation: results of a phase 3 randomized study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this