TY - JOUR
T1 - Of property and antiproperty
AU - Bell, Abraham
AU - Parchomovsky, Gideon
PY - 2003/10
Y1 - 2003/10
N2 - In this Article, we introduce the concept of anti-property - a private conservation mechanism that allows only socially desirable development. Our mechanism utilizes veto rights to create a collective holdout dynamic that thwarts undesirable uses of conservation commons. We demonstrate, counterintuitively, that when transaction costs systematically bias the market against conservation, the best response may be to create countervailing transaction costs. We also show how the combination of a private anti-property mechanism with a carefully designed takings law may result in an optimal balance between conservation and development.
AB - In this Article, we introduce the concept of anti-property - a private conservation mechanism that allows only socially desirable development. Our mechanism utilizes veto rights to create a collective holdout dynamic that thwarts undesirable uses of conservation commons. We demonstrate, counterintuitively, that when transaction costs systematically bias the market against conservation, the best response may be to create countervailing transaction costs. We also show how the combination of a private anti-property mechanism with a carefully designed takings law may result in an optimal balance between conservation and development.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442538827&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2307/3595399
DO - 10.2307/3595399
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
AN - SCOPUS:2442538827
SN - 0026-2234
VL - 102
SP - 1
EP - 70
JO - Michigan Law Review
JF - Michigan Law Review
IS - 1
ER -