Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, we face an exacerbation of ageism as well as a flourish of intergenerational solidarity. The use of chronological age is an unjustified threshold for the creation of public policies to control the spreading of the virus; doing so reinforces intrapersonal and interpersonal negative age stereotypes and violates older persons’ human rights to autonomy, proper care treatment, work, and equality. By overlooking differences within age groups, measures formulated solely on the basis of age are unable to target beneficiaries’ needs. Concurrently, several initiatives are trying to overcome ageist practices by providing different types of assistance to older adults on the basis of need rather than chronological age. The Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network EuroAgeism calls on policymakers to refrain from ageist practices and language, as they exacerbate our ability to meet the COVID-19 crisis and future emergencies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 506-514 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Aging and Social Policy |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 4-5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 3 Jul 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020, © 2020 Taylor & Francis.
Funding
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation progamme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 764632.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation progamme | |
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | |
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions | 764632 |
Keywords
- COVID-19
- ageism
- intergenerational solidarity
- older persons’ rights
- policy