Nonmonotonicity and the Scope of Reasoning: Preliminary Report

David W. Etherington, Sarit Kraus, Donald Perlis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Existing formalisms for default reasoning capture some aspects of the nonmonotonicity of human commonsense reasoning. However, Perlis has shown that one of these formalisms, circumscription, is subject to certain counterintuitive limitations. Kraus and Perus suggested a partial solution, but significant problems remain. In this paper, we observe that the unfortunate limitations of circumscription are even broader than Perlis originally pointed out. Moreover, these problems are not confined to circumscription; they appear to be endemic in current nonmonotonic reasoning formalisms. We develop a much more general solution than that of Kraus and Perlis, involving restricting the scope of nonmonotonic reasoning, and show that it remedies these problems in a variety of formalisms.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 1990
PublisherAAAI press
Pages600-607
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)026251057X, 9780262510578
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes
Event8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 1990 - Boston, United States
Duration: 29 Jul 19903 Aug 1990

Publication series

NameProceedings of the 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 1990

Conference

Conference8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 1990
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityBoston
Period29/07/903/08/90

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 1990, AAAI (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.

Funding

Supported in part by ARO research contract no. DAAL03-88-K0087.

FundersFunder number
Army Research OfficeDAAL03-88-K0087

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Nonmonotonicity and the Scope of Reasoning: Preliminary Report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this