Abstract
Human communication is dominated by auditory and visual information. In contrast, many animals use smell to communicate — both immediate and long-term effects of chemical signals have been documented within many species, from yeasts to mammals. This contrast raises two questions. Are humans well-equipped for broadcasting and receiving social chemical messages? And do we communicate through such messages? A study reported by Stern and McClintock1 on page 177 of this issue suggests that the answer to both of these questions is 'yes'.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 126-127 |
Journal | Nature, 392, 126-127. |
Volume | 392 |
State | Published - 1998 |