Abstract
We consider the model of "adversarial queuing theory" for packet networks introduced by Borodin et al. [J. ACM. 48 (2001). pp. 13-38]. We show that the scheduling protocol first-in-first-out (FIFO) can be unstable at any injection rate larger than 1/2 and that it is always stable if the injection rate is less than 1/d, where d is the length of the longest route used by any packet. We further show that every work-conserving (i.e., greedy) scheduling policy is stable if the injection rate is less than 1/(d + 1).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 286-303 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | SIAM Journal on Computing |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Adversarial queuing theory
- Lower bounds
- Network protocols
- Stability