Neurocognitive function in clinically stable men with bipolar I disorder or schizophrenia and normal control subjects

Lori L. Altshuler, Joseph Ventura, Wilfred G. Van Gorp, Michael F. Green, David C. Theberge, Jim Mintz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

258 Scopus citations

Abstract

Patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia have been shown to have neurocognitive deficits when compared with control subjects. The degree and pattern of impairment between psychiatric groups have rarely been compared, especially when subjects are psychiatrically stable. Using a standard neurocognitive battery, we compared euthymic outpatients with bipolar disorder (n = 40), stable patients with schizophrenia (n = 20), and subjects with no psychiatric disorder (n = 22). The neurocognitive domains assessed included executive functioning, verbal memory, visual memory, procedural learning, visuoconstructive ability, and language functions. Effect sizes were calculated for each cognitive domain across groups. Stable schizophrenic subjects demonstrated a generalized cognitive impairment across most domains compared with control subjects, with average effect sizes of. 9. Euthymic bipolar subjects were significantly impaired compared with control subjects only in executive functioning (Wisconsin Card Sorting Task) and verbal memory (California Verbal Learning Test) domains (effect sizes in the. 8-.9 range). Performance on the executive function measures was bimodal among bipolar subjects, suggesting two subgroups: one with relatively normal and one with impaired executive functioning. No significant differences between the bipolar patient group and control subjects were observed in visuoconstructive ability, procedural learning, or language function. Both euthymic bipolar subjects and relatively stable schizophrenic subjects differed from control subjects in neurocognitive function. Among schizophrenic subjects, a generalized cognitive impairment was observed, and the degree of impairment was greater in the schizophrenic compared with the bipolar subjects. Subjects with bipolar disorder were impaired in two specific domains (verbal memory and executive function). Furthermore, within the bipolar group there was a subset with relatively normal executive functioning and a subset with significant impairment. Possible reasons for the persistence of these neurocognitive deficits in some subjects with bipolar disorder during periods of euthymia are reviewed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)560-569
Number of pages10
JournalBiological Psychiatry
Volume56
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Oct 2004
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by a Merit Review Award, Department of Veteran Affairs, and a Stanley Medical Research Institute research grant (both to LLA). Lori L. Altshuler serves as a consultant or is on the advisory board and speakers’ bureau for Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Forrest Laboratories, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer Inc. Additionally, she has research support from Abbott Laboratories, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer.

Funding

This research was supported by a Merit Review Award, Department of Veteran Affairs, and a Stanley Medical Research Institute research grant (both to LLA). Lori L. Altshuler serves as a consultant or is on the advisory board and speakers’ bureau for Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Forrest Laboratories, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer Inc. Additionally, she has research support from Abbott Laboratories, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer.

FundersFunder number
Department of Veteran Affairs
Abbott Laboratories
Eli Lilly and Company
Pfizer
Stanley Medical Research Institute

    Keywords

    • Bipolar illness
    • function
    • neurocognition
    • neuropsychology
    • schizophrenia

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Neurocognitive function in clinically stable men with bipolar I disorder or schizophrenia and normal control subjects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this