Negative Sentences Exhibit a Sustained Effect in Delayed Verification Tasks

Galit Agmon, Yonatan Loewenstein, Yosef Grodzinsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Negated sentences are known to be more cognitively taxing than positive ones (i.e., polarity effect). We present evidence that two factors contribute to the polarity effect in verification tasks: processing the sentence and verifying its truth value. To quantify the relative contribution of each, we used a delayed verification task. The results show that even when participants are given a considerable amount of time for processing the sentence prior to verification, the polarity effect is not entirely eliminated. We suggest that this sustained effect stems from a retained negation-containing representation in working memory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-141
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Psychological Association

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Israel Science Foundation (ISF 2093/16 and ISF 757/16) and funding provided by the Gatsby Charitable Foundation.

FundersFunder number
Gatsby Charitable Foundation
Israel Science FoundationISF 2093/16, ISF 757/16

    Keywords

    • Negation
    • Quantifiers
    • Sentence processing
    • Sentence representation
    • Verification

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Negative Sentences Exhibit a Sustained Effect in Delayed Verification Tasks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this