Abstract
This paper focuses on a particular type of metaphorical irony in which both readings of a metaphor have to be processed in order to grasp the speaker's intention. Two ways in which the text encourages retention of both readings of metaphorical expressions are discussed: (1) Metaphorical expressions that refer to two different referents, whose comparison by the author requires keeping both readings in mind; (2) Two kinds of contextual clues assigned to a single referent or topic. The examples are amusingly sophisticated, but at the same time express a critical stance on controversial issues. The metaphorical irony enhances the critical, evaluative aspect of the text as it contributes to its entertaining effect.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Discourse of Indirectness. Cues, voices and functions |
Editors | Zohar Livnat, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar, Galia Hirsch |
Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company |
Pages | 39-58 |
Number of pages | 20 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9789027260567 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2020 |
Publication series
Name | Pragmatics and Beyond New Series |
---|---|
Volume | 316 |
ISSN (Print) | 0922-842X |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 John Benjamins Publishing Company. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Figurative language
- Grice
- Implicature
- Literal meaning
- Metaphorical irony
- Relevance Theory
- Retention/Suppression Hypothesis