Must We Provide Material Redress for Past Wrongs?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This short essay aims to demonstrate several reasons why the plausible answer to this chapter's title is rarely. Due to the nature of such a plural argument, “rarely” is an adequate conclusion. There is no single overwhelming reason to argue that material redress for past wrongs is unjustifiable, but there are numerous counter arguments to such claims, which, in the aggregate, make it nearly implausible that there are convincing claims for redress following past wrongs.
Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationContemporary Debates in Applied Ethics
EditorsAndrew I. Cohen, Christopher Heath Wellman
PublisherBlackwell Publishing
Pages203-216
Edition2
ISBN (Electronic)9781118479872
ISBN (Print)9781118479391
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Must We Provide Material Redress for Past Wrongs?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this