Multi-sorted argumentation

Tjitze Rienstra, Alan Perotti, Serena Villata, Dov M. Gabbay, Leendert Van Der Torre

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the theory of abstract argumentation, the acceptance status of arguments is normally determined for the complete set of arguments at once, under a single semantics. However, this is not always desired. In this paper, we extend the notion of an argumentation framework to a multi-sorted argumentation framework, and we motivate this extension using an example which considers practical and epistemic arguments. In a multi-sorted argumentation framework, the arguments are partitioned into a number of cells, where each cell is associated with a semantics under which its arguments are evaluated. We prove the properties of the proposed framework, and we demonstrate our theory with a number of examples. Finally, we relate our theory to the theory of modal fibring of argumentation networks.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTheory and Applications of Formal Argumentation - First International Workshop, TAFA 2011, Revised Selected Papers
Pages215-231
Number of pages17
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes
Event1st International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation, TAFA 2011 - Barcelona, Spain
Duration: 16 Jul 201117 Jul 2011

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume7132 LNAI
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference1st International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation, TAFA 2011
Country/TerritorySpain
CityBarcelona
Period16/07/1117/07/11

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-sorted argumentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this