Motivations and willingness to provide care from a geographical distance, and the impact of distance care on caregivers' mental and physical health: A mixed-method systematic review protocol

Eva Bei, Mikołaj Zarzycki, Val Morrison, Noa Vilchinsky

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction Distance caregivers (DCGs) are a growing population with substantial contribution to informal care. While a reasonable amount is known on the determinants of motives and willingness to provide local informal care, and the local caregiver outcomes, reports for the distance caregiving population are lacking. An evidence synthesis of what motivates and makes DCGs willing to care from a distance and the impact of that care on their mental and physical health would highlight any gaps or consensus in knowledge. This would guide the research needed towards the development of tailored interventions, in order to support DCGs and promote the sustainability of distance care. Methods and analysis This protocol adheres to Preferred Items for Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Methodology for mixed-method reviews. A comprehensive search strategy will be conducted in four electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed and PsycINFO). Grey literature will also be assessed to minimise publication bias. Two independent reviewers will assess each study for inclusion and any discrepancies will be resolved with the consultation of a third reviewer. Eligible studies for inclusion will be English language studies exploring the motives and willingness to care for a care recipient with a chronic disease, disability or frailty from a geographical distance; or studies focusing on the mental and physical health outcomes of DCGs. Qualitative and quantitative data will be integrated in a single qualitative synthesis following the JBI convergent integrated approach. Study quality will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2018. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for this study as no primary data will be collected. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and presentations at academic conferences and lay summaries for various stakeholders. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020156350.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere045660
JournalBMJ Open
Volume11
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 7 Jul 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Keywords

  • anxiety disorders
  • depression & mood disorders
  • mental health
  • primary care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Motivations and willingness to provide care from a geographical distance, and the impact of distance care on caregivers' mental and physical health: A mixed-method systematic review protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this