Modal Adventures between Leibniz and Kant: Existence and (Temporal, Logical, Real) Possibilities

O. Nachtomy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This paper explores the philosophical transitions in the relations between existence and possibility in Leibniz and Kant. It begins with Leibniz’s formulation of a strictly logical notion of possibility; proceeds with Kant’s pre-critical statement in 1763 that existence is not a predicate; and ends with the Critique of Pure Reason in which the theory of possibility is constrained by the subjective conditions of experience (to supply the material for thinking possibilities) and is thus relativized to the human mind. I present Leibniz’s view of possibility against the traditional view of temporal modalities; and, in this light, his dual notion of existence. I then argue that, in Kant’s pre-critical essay of 1763, the view that existence is not a predicate is strongly related to the logical view of possibility advanced by Leibniz. I conclude with Kant’s transition to the critical period and its implications on the analysis of modality
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Actual and the Possible
Subtitle of host publicationModality and Metaphysics in Modern Philosophy
EditorsM. Sinclair
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherOxford University Press
Chapter3
Pages64-93
Number of pages30
EditionFirst edition
ISBN (Electronic)0191089745, 0191828750
ISBN (Print)9780198786436
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Publication series

NameMind Association occasional series

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modal Adventures between Leibniz and Kant: Existence and (Temporal, Logical, Real) Possibilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this