TY - JOUR
T1 - Minimally invasive approach in endometrial cancer with lower uterine segment involvement in stage ≥ II
T2 - A retrospective study
AU - Perri, Tamar
AU - Levin, Gabriel
AU - Helpman, Limor
AU - Eitan, Ram
AU - Vaknin, Zvi
AU - Lavie, Ofer
AU - Ben Arie, Alon
AU - Amit, Amnon
AU - Levy, Tally
AU - Namazov, Ahmet
AU - Ben Shachar, Inbar
AU - Atlas, Ilan
AU - Bruchim, Ilan
AU - Kogan, Liron
AU - Gemer, Ofer
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Objective: To compare oncological outcomes in women with lower uterine segment involvement (LUSI) in endometrial carcinoma (EC) stage ≥ II - staged by a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus laparotomy. Study design: A retrospective multi-center cohort study. Univariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analysis were performed to compare between women staged by MIS and those staged by laparotomy. Results: Over a median follow-up period of 3 years (interquartile range, 1.5–6 years) 212 women were included, 68 (32.1%) were surgically staged by MIS. Stages of disease did not vary between MIS and laparotomy and were 32.1%, 51.9%, and 16.0%, in stages II, III and IV – respectively. Adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy rate did not differ between groups. Overall recurrence rate was comparable (p = 0.084). Locoregional recurrence rate was higher in the MIS group odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.19–4.20). Overall and progression free survival were similar in both groups (log rank test p = 0.08 and p = 0.912 respectively). In Cox regression model adjusting for age, comorbidities, tumor grade, stage and adjuvant therapy, route of surgery (MIS vs. laparotomy) was not associated with overall survival (p = 0.169). Conclusions: In women with advanced EC and LUSI, although MIS is associated with locoregional recurrences, survival is comparable to laparotomy.
AB - Objective: To compare oncological outcomes in women with lower uterine segment involvement (LUSI) in endometrial carcinoma (EC) stage ≥ II - staged by a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus laparotomy. Study design: A retrospective multi-center cohort study. Univariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analysis were performed to compare between women staged by MIS and those staged by laparotomy. Results: Over a median follow-up period of 3 years (interquartile range, 1.5–6 years) 212 women were included, 68 (32.1%) were surgically staged by MIS. Stages of disease did not vary between MIS and laparotomy and were 32.1%, 51.9%, and 16.0%, in stages II, III and IV – respectively. Adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy rate did not differ between groups. Overall recurrence rate was comparable (p = 0.084). Locoregional recurrence rate was higher in the MIS group odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.19–4.20). Overall and progression free survival were similar in both groups (log rank test p = 0.08 and p = 0.912 respectively). In Cox regression model adjusting for age, comorbidities, tumor grade, stage and adjuvant therapy, route of surgery (MIS vs. laparotomy) was not associated with overall survival (p = 0.169). Conclusions: In women with advanced EC and LUSI, although MIS is associated with locoregional recurrences, survival is comparable to laparotomy.
KW - Endometrial cancer
KW - Lower uterine segment
KW - Minimally invasive
KW - Prognosis
KW - Recurrence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119177846&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.012
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34800816
AN - SCOPUS:85119177846
SN - 0301-2115
VL - 268
SP - 43
EP - 47
JO - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
JF - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
ER -