Measuring and comparing immigration, asylum and naturalization policies across countries: Challenges and solutions

Justin Gest, Anna Boucher, Suzanna Challen, Brian Burgoon, Eiko Thielemann, Michel Beine, Patrick Mcgovern, Mary Crock, Hillel Rapoport, Michael Hiscox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

Academics and policy makers require a better understanding of the variation of policies that regulate global migration, asylum and immigrant naturalization. At present, however, there is no comprehensive cross-national, time-series database of such policies, rendering the analysis of policy trends across and within these areas difficult at best. Several new immigration databases and indices have been developed in recent years. However, there is no consensus on how best to conceptualize, measure and aggregate migration policy indicators to allow for meaningful comparisons through time and across space. This article discusses these methodological challenges and introduces practical solutions that involve historical, multi-dimensional, disaggregated and transparent conceptualizing, measuring and compiling of cross-national immigration policies. Such an approach informs the International Migration Policy and Law Analysis (IMPALA) database.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-274
Number of pages14
JournalGlobal Policy
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2014
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 University of Durham and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring and comparing immigration, asylum and naturalization policies across countries: Challenges and solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this