Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Locally Private Hypothesis Testing

  • University of Alberta

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

We initiate the study of differentially private hypothesis testing in the local-model, under both the standard (symmetric) randomized-response mechanism (Warner, 1965; Kasiviswanathan et al., 2008) and the newer (non-symmetric) mechanisms (Bassily & Smith, 2015; Bassily et al., 2017). First, we study the general framework of mapping each user’s type into a signal and show that the problem of finding the maximum-likelihood distribution over the signals is feasible. Then we discuss the randomized-response mechanism and show that, in essence, it maps the null-and alternative-hypotheses onto new sets, an affine translation of the original sets. We then give sample complexity bounds for identity and independence testing under randomized-response. We then move to the newer nonsymmetric mechanisms and show that there too the problem of finding the maximum-likelihood distribution is feasible. Under the mechanism of Bassily et al (2017) we give identity and independence testers with better sample complexity than the testers in the symmetric case, and we also propose a χ2-based identity tester which we investigate empirically.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4605-4614
Number of pages10
JournalProceedings of Machine Learning Research
Volume80
StatePublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes
Event35th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2018 - Stockholm, Sweden
Duration: 10 Jul 201815 Jul 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Locally Private Hypothesis Testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this